|
Finland's new parliament and recently formed government
will have a difficult start as a result of the uncertainty
in the world economy. The termination of military operations
in Iraq has not eliminated the risks in the international
economy. On the other hand, Finland's economy is still strong.
Many expectations were created and promises about changes
were given before the recently held general election. The
core of the new government coalition comprises the Centre
Party and social democrats, with Anneli Jäätteenmäki
becoming Finland's first woman prime minister. When the Government
gets down to business, it will be worth recalling that only
when economic growth has been guaranteed will it be possible
to focus on redeeming other more attractive election pledges.
The base of the Finnish economy is, in many people's eyes,
more stable than most of the economies in Europe. The balance
of payments is showing a big surplus, likewise the public
sector. The level of corporate self-sufficiency is still adequate
and households are only moderately in debt. However, growth
prospects for the GDP have also been lowered in Finland in
recent weeks. Latest estimates vary between 1.5 and 2.5 per
cent. Consumer confidence has also started waning in Finland.
Companies are adopting a cautious attitude towards the near
future. Recent questionnaires on the economic trend show that
the situation will remain poor in the first half of this year
at least. Industrial order books have not grown during the
spring, and the degree of utilization capacity has fallen.
Although employment in industrial companies has shown a clear
drop, unemployment in the economy as a whole has not, as yet,
started to increase.
More employment
The factors threatening the world economy are linked to structural
problems both in the United States and Europe. In addition
to external threat factors, Finland will have its own unsolved
basic problems for the next few years, particularly with employment
and also an ageing population and public expenditure pressures.
Employment must definitely be increased in the next few years,
otherwise the base of the Finnish welfare model will start
to erode. Old cures on their own will not be adequate to accomplish
this; new moves will be needed.
The new government intends increasing public expenditure
by over a billion euros by the end of its term of office.
On the positive side, some of the increase will be directed
at Finnish know-how and developing the know-how base. On the
other hand, the new government intends reducing income tax
in particular, although much more cautiously than its predecessor.
For both structural and trade-cycle reasons one could have
hoped for a much braver line over tax reductions.
The government has committed itself to keeping central government
finances in balance during its term of office. Their strong
position at the moment provides a good starting point for
this. Finland can now afford economic stimulation through
fiscal policy, unlike many of the major EU countries, where
the opportunities for stimulation were wasted during the good
years, when inadequate provision was made for times that are
not so good.
In the final analysis what happens in an open, export-oriented
country such as Finland is dependent on what happens in the
world economy. One of the most important tasks of the domestic
economic policy will be to support the strengths of Finnish
know-how and competitiveness. In this way Finland will remain
attractive as a place in which to locate and invest.

|